<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IP/Internet/New Media Blog &#187; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netlaw.robertlink.org/category/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org</link>
	<description>blog for intellectual property, internet, and social media law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>USPTO Sparks Hopes For Marijuana Trademark Registration Then Snuffs Them Out</title>
		<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/20/uspto-sparks-hopes-for-marijuana-trademark-registration-then-snuffs-them-out/</link>
		<comments>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/20/uspto-sparks-hopes-for-marijuana-trademark-registration-then-snuffs-them-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>galengentry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uspto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlaw.robertlink.org/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galen Gentry In an article in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, Justin Scheck, described the short lived trademark category for marijuana.  The article reports that the USPTO plans on &#8216;shutting things down&#8217; by the end of the month, but apparently there was a brief period in which  the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office created a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://galengentry.com/internet-disputes-domain-name-trademark/trademark-litigation">Galen Gentry</a></p>
<p>In an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704682604575368783687129488.html">article</a> in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, Justin Scheck, described the short lived trademark category for marijuana.  The article reports that the USPTO plans on &#8216;shutting things down&#8217; by the end of the month, but apparently there was a brief period in which  the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office created a new trademark category dedicated to medical marijuana, spurring a hoards of applications from people and businesses in the 14 states where the drug is legal for medicinal purposes.  Among the trademarks: Chronic, Mellow Yellow, and Maui Wowie.  </p>
<p>The trademark agency said it was “highly unlikely” that the office would grant a medical marijuana trademark anytime soon because a product must be legal for interstate trade to be eligible for trademark protection&#8230;and so it goes.  An interesting but at least for now academic argument is whether whether long-used names for the drug could be trademarked if..uh it was legal it sell it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/20/uspto-sparks-hopes-for-marijuana-trademark-registration-then-snuffs-them-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

