<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ninth Circuit Overturns Bratz Trial Rulings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/28/ninth-circuit-overturns-bratz-trial-rulings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/28/ninth-circuit-overturns-bratz-trial-rulings/</link>
	<description>blog for intellectual property, internet, and social media law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phaedral</title>
		<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/28/ninth-circuit-overturns-bratz-trial-rulings/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>phaedral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlaw.robertlink.org/?p=314#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>Any suggestion this could go any higher? The 9th, after all, is notorious for being overturned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any suggestion this could go any higher? The 9th, after all, is notorious for being overturned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

