<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5th Circuit Soft on DMCA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/26/5th-circuit-soft-on-dmca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/26/5th-circuit-soft-on-dmca/</link>
	<description>blog for intellectual property, internet, and social media law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1201 Anti Circumvention Exemptions</title>
		<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/26/5th-circuit-soft-on-dmca/comment-page-1/#comment-4101</link>
		<dc:creator>1201 Anti Circumvention Exemptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlaw.robertlink.org/?p=304#comment-4101</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting development: there may be a split in the circuits on the question of whether circumventing for technology protection measures (TPM) is a DMCA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting development: there may be a split in the circuits on the question of whether circumventing for technology protection measures (TPM) is a DMCA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP/Internet/New Media Blog &#187; Librarian of Congress: Six Classes of Non-infringing Circumvention Defined</title>
		<link>http://netlaw.robertlink.org/2010/07/26/5th-circuit-soft-on-dmca/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>IP/Internet/New Media Blog &#187; Librarian of Congress: Six Classes of Non-infringing Circumvention Defined</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netlaw.robertlink.org/?p=304#comment-946</guid>
		<description>[...] fifth class would seem to bear on the 5th Circuit ruling mentioned in our previous post. (5) Computer programs protected by dongles that prevent access due to malfunction or damage and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fifth class would seem to bear on the 5th Circuit ruling mentioned in our previous post. (5) Computer programs protected by dongles that prevent access due to malfunction or damage and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

