These are likely to be two of the best posts you will read regarding the recently released ACTA text, filed at Balkinization by Margot Kaminski of the Yale Information Society Project:
The big picture issues are unchanged: 1) ACTA establishes a new institution outside of existing international law; 2) ACTA pushes the international standard for IP law to an IP-maximalist’s dream; and 3) when you establish the information-sharing and investigative infrastructure, bad things (civil liberty violations) will follow.
On April 6th the District of Columbia Court of Appeal ruled that the Federal Communications Commission has no authority to determine how internet services providers manage traffic to their customers. The case, Comcast v. FCC , is a blow to proponents of net neutrality. In 2008 the FCC ruled that Comcast improperly discriminated against certain internet content when it blocked some of its customers from using the popular BitTorrent Inc. technology which allows users to download large files such as videos more easily.
Comcast appealed and the three judge panel unanimously found that the FCC overstepped its bounds in the 2008 ruling. The court stated the FCC lacks direct authority from Congress to regulate internet traffic. The ruling brings the issue of net neutrality back to the fore. Some government and business leaders seek legislation which would prevent internet providers from curbing or charging higher prices for use of selected applications or access to certain websites.
At issue is whether telecommunications companies should be allowed to manipulate how fast or slow websites pages load on customers computers. Companies like Google support net neutrality which would prevent internet providers from curbing or charging higher prices for use of selected applications or access to certain websites. The telecom giants such Verizon and Comcast are against such legislation. President Obama supported previous efforts to enact net neutrality legislation and FCC chairman Julian Genachowski has made net neutrality a top priority.
The issue of net neutrality is a partisan one. It may take a long time for Congress to act. In the interim the FCC may appeal the ruling or it may seek to reclassify high speed internet service so that it would be regulated like telephone services under existing laws. The same companies which oppose net neutrality, the giant telecoms, would oppose such a move. If the FCC makes an effort to reclassify high speed internet service the telecom companies are sure to challenge the action in court.
America needs competition among its high-speed internet providers. Open access has proved to be an effective way to do this in other countries. The FCC’s rules on net neutrality were an adequate substitute. But with the Court’s ruling the United States now has neither.
The United States Patent Office issued a press release today stating that henceforth it would seek patent examiners by running ads in Playboy. The Office went on to state that rumors that everything worth inventing had been invented now that the ipad was a reality were in fact true.
Recent Comments